Facebook

Twitter

LinkedIn

 

refusal Tag

Supreme Court Cases About Taking Blood Samples

Supreme Court Cases About Taking Blood Samples

Blood samples taken from suspected drunk drivers have been the topic of several high-profile Supreme Court cases. Defendants have challenged whether compelled blood samples violate the Fifth Amendment and whether evidence of refusal to take a blood test violates the Fifth Amendment. In both cases, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government. In the case of Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966), a drunk driving suspect was arrested while in the hospital receiving treatment for injuries. At the hospital, a police officer ordered a doctor to take the driver’s blood sample. The sample was used as evidence, and...

Continue reading

Refusing to Take a Sobriety Test in Oklahoma

Refusing to Take a Sobriety Test in Oklahoma

While you may refuse to take a breath or blood test for the presence of alcohol in Oklahoma, there are consequences to refusal. The Oklahoma laws about refusing these tests specify exactly what happens if you refuse one of these two sobriety tests. First, anyone who operates a car or other vehicle on public roads in Oklahoma has given “implied consent” to taking a breath or blood test for alcohol concentration. 47 O.S. § 751. You do not have to be driving a car to give implied consent – if you are sitting in a parked car and your breath smells...

Continue reading